Anonymous peer comments. To alleviate many of the challenges mentioned in the previous section, rather than providing the identity of a reviewer, anonymous peer feedback could be used. Lu and Bol researchers suggest that anonymity in the peer feedback process can encourage student participation and reduce student participation. The review process is the long-standing method by which research quality is ensured. On the one hand, it aims to assess the quality of a manuscript, the desired result being theoretical. The average age of study participants varied. 2. AA TSF has been compared to clinical psychological interventions, such as MET and CBT, as well as variations of step programs. We assessed selection bias as high risk in included studies, uncertain risk in three cases, and low risk. This story is part of an EdSurge research series on how educators are changing their practices to reach all learners. Today was the big day. I was about to say the dreaded words “peer editing.” As I began class with my eighth grade students, I told them that we would be editing each other's research papers during our dual class period. As part of the unveiling event, guests were encouraged to wear masks as a nod to the anonymous nature of peer review. “We are living in a time of transition, where science is becoming truly global.