Science can be differentiated or demarcated from a variety of alternatives, such as religion, the arts, or the humanities. All these demarcations are potentially interesting, but the. In science, the expression of results occurs primarily in peer-reviewed scientific journals and meets high standards of accuracy and honesty. However, in pseudoscience, there is no review, no obligatory accuracy, and the public is the main target. Another difference appears in the results that, in science, results are obligatory. The postwar period saw right-wing scientists finding ways to cloak their racist views in more palatable language and concepts. And as Angela Saini convincingly argues in her new book. On the Margins: Where Science Meets Pseudoscience by Michael D. Gordin: Essay Review: Talking About Pseudo-Science Implies Scientism: The Importance of Not Being Serious About Science I would like to conclude my essay on the differences between science and pseudoscience in the words of Janet Stemwedel 2011: “The big difference that Popper identifies between science and pseudo-science is a difference in attitude. As pseudo-science is set up to search for evidence that supports its claims, Popper says: