To calculate the usability of the system, the following research questions are addressed. RQ determines the usability of the marker-based and keyboard-based AR application system using the SUS model. RQ compares and analyzes the usability of marker-based and keyboard-based AR application system using the HARUS model. The think-aloud method is a widely used method for evaluating the usability of websites and software. However, it can also be used with cartographic products, an area that has been neglected until now, Review Literature as Topic. This article examines how to synthesize and critique the research literature. To place the process of synthesizing research literature in context, the article explores the process of critique by breaking it down into seven sequential steps. The article explains how and why these steps should be followed · Assessing the accuracy of toponym-assisted georeferencing. To evaluate the accuracy of toponym-assisted georeferencing, we engage in two exercises. First, we test our implementation on a large collection of simulated maps and report the accuracy obtained for different types of map parameters. Literature reviews play a vital role in scholarship because science remains, above all, a cumulative effort Brocke et al. 2009. As in any academic discipline, rigorous syntheses of knowledge become essential to follow an exponentially growing literature on e-health, to assist practitioners and academics. The goal of this article is to assist emergency physicians in the analysis of these research articles in order to better integrate them into their own practice. In principle, the evaluation of the literature is closely related to the recent emphasis on evidence-based medicine, a topic that has a number of excellent reviews in the literature and on the subject. A contributing factor to disparities in tenure, promotion, and salary decisions is the almost ubiquitous reliance on student evaluations in educational SETs, Murray, 1984 Wachtel, 1998. This reliance exists at all institutions Despite the abundance of research demonstrating how student-led assessment can be problematic, Core Criteria: Overall quality of research. Various researchers have proposed criteria for evaluating qualitative research, which have been summarized in . Furthermore, the criteria described in effectively provide the different approaches to assess and evaluate the quality of qualitative work. Inputs are based on this system map that guided the evaluation design and helped identify data sources to support the evaluation. One example is a recent analysis of the implicit theory of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme, involving analysis of literature from NHS England and four providers, showing that there was no explicit theoretical basis for it, edited by WorkBot. the link works. Created by ImportBot. Imported from Talis MARC notice. Literature review by P. Haywood, 1982, TRC-Rediguides edition, in English. Review process and grouping under the following six general headings: 1 problem formulation, 2 literature search, 3 selection for inclusion, 4 quality assessment. , 5. Books and resources for your literature review. Educational research: plan, conduct and evaluate quantitative and qualitative studies. by John W. Creswell. ISBN: 9781292034379. Publication date: 2013. Conducting a literature review on health and social services by