Critical literature review is an essential skill that is used throughout a research career. This article demystifies the processes involved in systematically and critically reviewing literature to demonstrate knowledge, identify research ideas, position research, and develop theory. Although primarily intended for, the Technical Literature Review Committee (LSTRC) reviews and selects journals for MEDLINE based on research quality and journal impact. A distinctive feature of MEDLINE is that records are indexed with NLM MeSH medical subject headings. PubMed also contains citations to PubMed Central PMC articles; A literature review is a study of scientific sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods and gaps in existing research. There are five key steps to writing a literature review: Search for relevant literature. Evaluate sources. Identifying Themes, Debates, and Literature Review is a comprehensive survey of the published works in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth critical bibliographical essay or an annotated list. in which attention is drawn to the most significant works. Furthermore, we can define a literature review as the. This review aims to synthesize a published set of evaluation criteria for good qualitative research. The aim is to shed light on existing standards for assessing the rigor of qualitative research encompassing a range of epistemological and ontological viewpoints. Using a systematic search strategy, published journal articles that deliberate on criteria, a research plan is a strategy for answering your research question using empirical data. Creating a research plan means making decisions about: Your overall research goals and approach. Whether you rely on primary research or secondary research. Your sampling methods or subject selection criteria. Your data collection, The systematic review is a method whose main objective is to synthesize and summarize the results of studies on the same area of ​​research. Systematic reviews differ from literature reviews in certain aspects. The clearest difference is that systematic reviews involve a detailed, well-defined plan with a search strategy. This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on leadership research and theoretical framework. The author then sheds light on the historical basis of leadership theories. Literature reviews are fundamental to any study. They describe what we know about a given topic and lead us to identify a knowledge gap to study. All journals require that authors be able to accurately summarize, synthesize, interpret, and even critique the research literature. 1, in fact, for this editorial we had to review the literature,